Claims

The acquisition detriment after exercise was driven by the accuracy subcomponent: older participants reduced force error after rest but not after exercise

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Force error showed a significant Group × Block × Age interaction; older participants reduced error following rest but not exercise, while younger-old participants reduced error in both conditions. → Eleanor M. Taylor 2024

Evidence

Eleanor M. Taylor 2024

Eleanor M. Taylor, Claire J. Cadwallader, Dylan Curtin, Trevor T.-J. Chong, Joshua J. Hendrikse & James P. Coxon. (2024). High-intensity acute exercise impacts motor learning in healthy older adults. npj Science of Learning 9:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00220-2

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Same randomised between-groups acquisition analysis, force error subcomponent. The article reports "Force error scores showed a three-way interaction between Group, Block and Age (F(1, 195.00) = 5.70, p =0 . 0 2 )"; older participants' error reduction after exercise was not significant (p = 0.45). No effect size printed.

"Force error scores showed a three-way interaction between Group, Block and Age (F(1, 195.00) = 5.70, p =0 . 0 2 )"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.