Claims

Trial time during acquisition was unaffected by exercise group but slowed over blocks for older participants

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No significant main effect of Group on trial time; a Block × Age interaction showed older participants decreased speed over time while younger-old did not, and this did not vary across rest and exercise. → Eleanor M. Taylor 2024

Evidence

Eleanor M. Taylor 2024

Eleanor M. Taylor, Claire J. Cadwallader, Dylan Curtin, Trevor T.-J. Chong, Joshua J. Hendrikse & James P. Coxon. (2024). High-intensity acute exercise impacts motor learning in healthy older adults. npj Science of Learning 9:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00220-2

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Acquisition analysis of the speed measure in the same study. The article reports "no signi ficant main effect of Group (F(1, 19.00) = 0.72, p = 0.40)", a Block × Age interaction (F(1, 19.00) = 7.62, p = 0.01), and no Group × Block × Age effect (p = 0.16). Null result; equivalence not tested.

"Analysis of trial time revealed no signi ficant main effect of Group (F(1, 19.00) = 0.72, p = 0.40), though there was a main effect of Block"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.