Formative assessment interventions have a significant positive effect on student learning in Turkish experimental studies (random-effects g = .72)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Across 47 effect sizes from 32 experimental and quasi-experimental studies in Turkey, formative assessment interventions significantly improved student learning (g = .72, SE = .07, 95% CI .59–.85). → Pinar Karaman 2021

Evidence¶

Pinar Karaman 2021¶

Pinar Karaman. (2021). The Effect of Formative Assessment Practices on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.870300

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 32 studies with 47 effect sizes meeting inclusion criteria (true experimental or quasi-experimental designs measuring learning outcomes), analyzed with a random effects model in ProMeta3. The article reports "a significant effect of formative assessment on student learning" with g = .72; 3253 participants were involved in the analysis.

"By using random effects model, overall meta-analysis showed that there was a significant effect of formative assessment on student learning (g= .72, SE= .07, 95% CI= .59; 85, p<.05)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Flipped learning has a medium positive effect on students' academic achievement in Turkish experimental studies after publication-bias correction (Hedges's g = 0.713) — related
• Science effects differed by country of evaluation, with U.S. studies (g = 0.46) showing smaller effects than Turkish studies (g = 0.96) — related