Experimental-group students showed higher cross-subject integration, design knowledge, and creative-task readiness than check-group students after the forming stage¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Experimental-group students showed abilities to integrate knowledge from different subjects 30% higher and designer and construction knowledge 47% higher than check groups; all experimental students were ready to solve creative tasks versus about 65% (186 people) in check groups. → Sidorov et al. 2018

Evidence¶

Sidorov et al. 2018¶

Oleg V. Sidorov, Lyubov’ V. Kozub, Alexander V. Goferberg, Natalya V. Osintseva. (2018). Organization and Carrying out the Educational Experiment and Statistical Analysis of its Results in IHL. European Journal of Contemporary Education. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.1.177

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Forming-stage comparison between experimental groups taught with the created laboratory installations and check groups using special literature during practical lessons; the article also reports check-group knowledge and skills 17–55% lower on different parameters and about 65% (186 people) of check students ready for creative tasks. Percentages are descriptive, no statistical test printed.

"So, the students of the experimental groups showed the abilities to integrate knowledge from different subjects 30 % higher, their designer and construction knowledge – 47 % higher."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cognitive and creative results were 12% higher at the university with better laboratory equipment than at the two comparison universities — related
• Before the experiment, most students lacked sufficient knowledge for cross-disciplinary integration and were unfamiliar with the target equipment — related