A large-scale, rigorous study compared four elementary math curricula's effects on achievement across two years, first through second grade¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-10-14 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The study examined how four math curricula affect achievement across two years, from first through second grades, and was prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. → Agodini 2013
q2 i? The study was a large-scale, rigorous evaluation of how four math curricula affected achievement from first through second grades. → Agodini 2013
Evidence¶
Agodini 2013¶
Agodini, R., Harris, B., Seftor, N., Remillard, J., & Thomas, M. (2013). After Two Years, Three Elementary Math Curricula Outperform a Fourth (In Focus Brief). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/after-two-years-three-elementary-math-curricula-outperform-a-fourth-infocus-brief
q2 · i? · causal · r?
The abstract describes the associated evaluation as "a large-scale, rigorous study" of four curricula across grades 1–2, conducted under the project "Evaluation of Mathematics Curricula" (time frame 2005–2013) for the Institute of Education Sciences.
"a large-scale, rigorous study examining how four math curricula affect achievement across two years—from first through second grades"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- After two years, three of four elementary math curricula outperform a fourth in achievement across first and second grades — related
- First-grade math achievement is significantly higher under Math Expressions and Saxon Math than under Investigations in Number, Data, and Space and Scott Foresman-Addison Wesley Mathematics — related
- The study is the largest experimental-design study of multiple math curricula, covering 110 schools with this report based on the first cohort of 39 schools — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A large-scale experimental study compared the effects of the four mathematics curricula on student achievement — related
- The early elementary math curriculum used by schools mattered for student achievement in first and second grade — related
- Four elementary math curricula were evaluated using an experimental design — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The curriculum evaluation was the second report from a multi-year (2005-2013) IES-funded study of mathematics curricula — related
- Many U.S. students enter elementary school with poor math skills — related
- The study examines whether some early elementary school math curricula are more effective than others at improving math achievement in schools serving a high percentage of disadvantaged students. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
four-curricula-two-year-elementary-math-study-design |
aliases |
four-curricula-two-year-achievement-study |
title |
A large-scale, rigorous study compared four elementary math curricula's effects on achievement across two years, first through second grade |
description |
A large-scale, rigorous study compared four elementary math curricula's effects on achievement across two years, first through second grade |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
source_checked |
2026-10-14 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — agodini-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.