The curriculum evaluation was the second report from a multi-year (2005-2013) IES-funded study of mathematics curricula¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · checked against its sources 2026-10-08 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? This report is the second from a large-scale study for the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences, under the Evaluation of Mathematics Curricula project spanning 2005-2013. → Agodini 2010
Evidence¶
Agodini 2010¶
Agodini, R., Harris, B., Thomas, M., Murphy, R., & Gallagher, L. (2010). Achievement Effects of Four Early Elementary School Math Curricula: Findings for First and Second Graders. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Descriptive context from the publication page: the report is "the second from a large-scale study" of four early math programs, prepared for the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences under the associated Evaluation of Mathematics Curricula project (2005-2013).
"This report, the second from a large-scale study for the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences of four early math programs"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The early elementary math curriculum used by schools mattered for student achievement in first and second grade — related
- A large-scale, rigorous study compared four elementary math curricula's effects on achievement across two years, first through second grade — related
- A large-scale experimental study compared the effects of the four mathematics curricula on student achievement — related
- Many U.S. students enter elementary school with poor math skills — related
- The evaluation uses a school-level random assignment design to estimate the relative effects of four early elementary math curricula — related
- After two years, three of four elementary math curricula outperform a fourth in achievement across first and second grades — related
- The study examines whether some early elementary school math curricula are more effective than others at improving math achievement in schools serving a high percentage of disadvantaged students. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ies-math-curricula-evaluation-second-report |
title |
The curriculum evaluation was the second report from a multi-year (2005-2013) IES-funded study of mathematics curricula |
description |
The curriculum evaluation was the second report from a multi-year (2005-2013) IES-funded study of mathematics curricula |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
source_checked |
2026-10-08 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — agodini-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.