Four scholarly responses apply Willis et al.'s typology to K-12 learning analytics from educational, practice, ethical, and policy perspectives¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Four respondents focused on the K-12 educational environment, practice K-12, ethical, and policy perspectives, offering applications of Willis et al.'s study to mitigate harm to students. → Gloria Natividad Beltrán del Río 2021

Evidence¶

Gloria Natividad Beltrán del Río 2021¶

Gloria Natividad Beltrán del Río. (2021). The importance of always bearing in mind students' privacy, consent, vulnerability, and agency issues. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09954-x

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

Editorial describes a four-paper response collection: Beerwinkle on K-12 environments and potential risk of harm, Heath on data mining ethics, Parsons on a "Learning Analytics As" approach, and Weng on policy insight for stakeholders and IRB reviewers.

"Four scholars volunteered to write a response to Willis et al.'s (2016) research article, focusing their papers on the perspectives of K-12 educational environment, practice K-12, ethical, and policy"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Willis et al. (2016) identify four common ethical issues in internal student data usage across three institutions — a broader claim this one bears on
• K-12 students are at risk of harm when local education agencies use digital learning analytics without carefully reflecting on the risks of resulting decisions — related