Claims

Instructional designers embed four types of interaction in online courses: simulations, visuals, navigation elements, and game-like elements

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Thematic analysis of interviews with 15 instructional designers yielded four categories of interaction embedded in learning objects: simulations, visuals, navigation elements, and game-like elements. → Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb 2025

Evidence

Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb 2025

Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb, Gamze Ozogul. (2025). Interaction analysis of learning objects in online courses: What are their interactive characteristics and design intent behind them? Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10556-0

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Basic qualitative study with semi-structured interviews (40-60 min) with 15 US higher education instructional designers; thematic analysis identified four interaction categories from participants' objects and descriptions: "Interactions as simulations," visuals, navigation elements, and game-like elements including badges, avatars, and a course designed as a game.

"Based on the participants’ learning objects and their descriptions, it is possible to cat- egorise interactions embedded within them as follows:"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id four-types-interaction-online-courses
title Instructional designers embed four types of interaction in online courses: simulations, visuals, navigation elements, and game-like elements
description Instructional designers embed four types of interaction in online courses: simulations, visuals, navigation elements, and game-like elements
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — victoria-abramenka-lachheb-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.