Claims

Fraction-focused interventions significantly improved mathematics outcomes over operations-focused interventions for students with MD

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Fractions interventions were a statistically significant predictor of effect size relative to interventions in operations (p = .04). → Stevens 2018

Evidence

Stevens 2018

Stevens, E. A., Rodgers, M. A., & Powell, S. R. (2018). Intensive interventions in mathematics for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517731887

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis of treatment content (problem solving versus operations versus fractions) in the meta-analysis. The article reports "fractions interventions significantly improved students' mathematics outcomes over interventions in operations (p = .04)"; no effect size is printed.

"The results also revealed that fractions interventions significantly improved students' mathematics outcomes over interventions in operations (p = .04)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.