Stakeholder survey rated achievability lowest across Framework elements, especially Element 5 (continuous improvement)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? For Element 5, while 21 of 22 survey participants rated it suitable, far fewer considered it clear (13 of 22) and achievable (8 of 22). → Walsh 2022

Evidence¶

Walsh 2022¶

Walsh, K., Pink, E., Ayling, N., Sondergeld, A., Dallaston, E., Tournas, P., Serry, E., Trotter, S., Spanos, T., & Rogic, N. (2022). Best Practice Framework for Online Safety Education: Results from a rapid review of the international literature, expert review, and stakeholder consultation. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, Article number: 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100474

q2 · i? · design · r2

Anonymous online survey of organisational representatives after the focus groups (completed by 22, response rate 43%), rating each element on five-point Likert-type items for suitability, fairness, clarity and achievability. For Element 5, "far fewerconsidereditwasclear(13of22)andachievable(8of22)". Percentages are descriptive; no inferential test printed.

"Howeverfar fewerconsidereditwasclear(13of22)andachievable(8of22)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A FACTRIA-aware chatbot increases the number of biasing sub-factors stakeholders consider when interpreting institutional analytics visualizations — related
• Expert review and stakeholder consultation established strong consensus on the need for and acceptability of the Framework — related