Expert review and stakeholder consultation established strong consensus on the need for and acceptability of the Framework¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Consultation with 7 experts and 51 organisational representatives found the draft Framework acceptable as a high-level framework applicable to a broad range of school contexts and sufficiently flexible. → Walsh 2022

Evidence¶

Walsh 2022¶

Walsh, K., Pink, E., Ayling, N., Sondergeld, A., Dallaston, E., Tournas, P., Serry, E., Trotter, S., Spanos, T., & Rogic, N. (2022). Best Practice Framework for Online Safety Education: Results from a rapid review of the international literature, expert review, and stakeholder consultation. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 33, Article number: 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100474

q2 · i? · design · r2

Stage 2 qualitative consultation: individual semi-structured interviews with 7 online safety experts (Australia n=3, UK n=3, USA n=2) and three focus groups with 51 organisational representatives, plus a survey completed by 22 representatives (43% response rate). The consultation "established strongconsensusabouttheneedfor,andimportanceof" the Framework.

"The expert review and stakeholder consultation established strongconsensusabouttheneedfor,andimportanceof,aBest Practice Framework for Online Safety Education."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Stakeholders identified student groups underserved by online safety education, including children with disability and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children
• Stakeholder survey rated achievability lowest across Framework elements, especially Element 5 (continuous improvement) — related
• The framework's recommendations were derived from a research and practices review plus 59 expert interviews — related