54 of 59 FRTF behavioral examples were sorted better than chance and 48 by a majority of educator participants¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In the second sorting task matching behavioral examples to talents, 54 of 59 examples were sorted better than chance into their proposed talent and 48 of 59 were sorted correctly by more than half of participants. → Pretti 2021

Evidence¶

Pretti 2021¶

Pretti, T. J., Etmanski, B., & Drewery, D. W. (2021). Development and validation of a future ready talent framework. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, Special Issue, 22(3), 369-383. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313416

q3 · i? · design · r2

Second sorting task of the online study (n = 97 educators), where participants matched behavioral examples to the defined talents within each cluster, with a does-not-belong option and trap items. Table 4 prints one-sample t-tests per item, e.g., Uses clear and concise language 96.6%, t = 37.23, p < .001. The article reads this as "a high degree of agreement between participants."

"Of the 59 behavioral examples, 54 were sorted better than chance into their proposed talent. More than that, 48 of 59 behavioral examples in the framework were sorted into the correct talent by more than half of the participants."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Several FRTF behavioral examples were not sorted better than chance, including actively listening to others (18.2%) and exploring implications of proposed solutions (9.4%) — reports the opposite
• A literature synthesis of 46 talent frameworks and future-of-work reports yielded 29 unique talents reduced to the FRTF's 12 talents — related
• Educators sorted 11 talents into the proposed FRTF clusters significantly above chance, from 94.8% (self-assessment) to 44.8% (critical thinking) — related