Several FRTF behavioral examples were not sorted better than chance, including actively listening to others (18.2%) and exploring implications of proposed solutions (9.4%)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Five behavioral examples failed to exceed chance sorting: Actively listens to others (18.2%, t = -1.65, p = .103), Pays attention when others are speaking (10.2%, t = -4.55, p < .001), Asks relevant questions about important issues (11.9%, t = -3.68, p = .001), and Explores implications of proposed solutions (9.4%, t = -4.89, p < .001). → Pretti 2021
Evidence¶
Pretti 2021¶
Pretti, T. J., Etmanski, B., & Drewery, D. W. (2021). Development and validation of a future ready talent framework. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, Special Issue, 22(3), 369-383. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313416
q3 · i? · design · r2
Row from Table 4 of the same educator sorting study (n = 97): the behavioral example "Actively listens to others," proposed under Collaboration, was sorted correctly by only 18.2% of participants, a one-sample t-test not exceeding the .25 chance value. Related below-chance rows include Pays attention when others are speaking (10.2%) and Asks relevant questions about important issues (11.9%).
"38. Actively listens to others. 18.2 -1.65 .103"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 54 of 59 FRTF behavioral examples were sorted better than chance and 48 by a majority of educator participants — reports the opposite
- A literature synthesis of 46 talent frameworks and future-of-work reports yielded 29 unique talents reduced to the FRTF's 12 talents — related
- Educators sorted 11 talents into the proposed FRTF clusters significantly above chance, from 94.8% (self-assessment) to 44.8% (critical thinking) — related
- About 61% of observed in-class student behavior was actively seeking knowledge or asking questions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
frtf-behavioral-examples-below-chance |
title |
Several FRTF behavioral examples were not sorted better than chance, including actively listening to others (18.2%) and exploring implications of proposed solutions (9.4%) |
description |
Several FRTF behavioral examples were not sorted better than chance, including actively listening to others (18.2%) and exploring implications of proposed solutions (9.4%) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pretti-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.