Stakeholder consultation with 60 WIL students, employers, and educators generated 1,806 behavioral examples distilled into 59¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Surveys of WIL students (n = 18), employers (n = 16), and educators (n = 26) produced 1,806 behavioral example responses, averaging 41.1 examples per talent (SD = 3.22). → Pretti 2021 q2 i? A steering committee reviewed the responses and identified 59 behavioral examples tied to the 12 talents. → Pretti 2021 (2)

Evidence¶

Pretti 2021¶

Pretti, T. J., Etmanski, B., & Drewery, D. W. (2021). Development and validation of a future ready talent framework. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, Special Issue, 22(3), 369-383. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313416

q2 · i? · design · r2

Stakeholder consultation survey in the extension-and-validation study. Participants were given FRTF talent definitions and "asked to share examples of such talents in the workplace." Employers were a convenience sample who had hired a WIL student in the previous year, across varied industries and positions.

"A total of 1,806 responses were provided. The average number of examples for each talent was 41.1 (SD = 3.22)."

Pretti 2021 (2)¶

Pretti, T. J., Etmanski, B., & Drewery, D. W. (2021). Development and validation of a future ready talent framework. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, Special Issue, 22(3), 369-383. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313416

q2 · i? · design · r2

The selected steering committee, comprising experts in WIL and talent development in higher education, reviewed, deduplicated, and synthesized the survey responses; the resulting 59 behavioral examples appear in Table 4 and were carried into the sorting validation.

"After removing duplicates and much discussion, 59 behavioral examples were identified (Table 4)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A literature synthesis of 46 talent frameworks and future-of-work reports yielded 29 unique talents reduced to the FRTF's 12 talents — related
• Peer-reviewed research and industry research describe soft skills that employers seek in new hires — a broader claim this one bears on
• Much student-consultation activity embeds unwitting manipulation of students rather than genuine voice — related
• Educators sorted 11 talents into the proposed FRTF clusters significantly above chance, from 94.8% (self-assessment) to 44.8% (critical thinking) — related