Full word-pair cues can promote rather than disrupt reactivation when delivered with sufficient spacing and during stable NREM sleep¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Contrary to prior reports that full cue-feedback pairs can block reactivation, this study found enhanced neural responses to the second word, particularly for difficult items. → Shin 2025
Evidence¶
Shin 2025¶
Shin, G.-H., Kweon, Y.-S., Oh, S., & Lee, S.-W. (2025). Personalized targeted memory reactivation enhances consolidation of challenging memories via slow wave and spindle dynamics. npj Science of Learning 10:47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00340-3
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Authors' interpretation from ERP and TFR analyses showing enhanced responses following the second word of each cue pair, suggesting the second word functioned as a reinstatement signal; each pair was delivered with approximately 5 s spacing during stable NREM sleep.
"the effectiveness of full-pair cues may depend on temporal precision, memory strength, and sleep-stage alignment, and that under optimal con ditions, full cues can successfully promote memory consolidation."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Long-Term Memory — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- TMR enhances declarative memory after one night of sleep across paradigms, though some recent studies did not replicate the effect — related
- TMR benefits on name recall are negatively correlated with post-cue sleep disruption and post-cue beta-band EEG power, suggesting reactivation depends on undisturbed sleep — related
- Auditory cueing during NREM sleep elevates slow wave and spindle power relative to no stimulation, with effects concentrated in frontal and central regions — related
- Closed-loop TMR timed to the slow-oscillation up-state improves memory consolidation relative to down-state cueing, though direct up-vs-down comparisons yield mixed results — related
- Personalized TMR improves recall accuracy for the most challenging (L3) word pairs, outperforming both uniform TMR and no-stimulation control in the post-sleep session — related
- Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples during SWS and waking support memory consolidation and spatial task performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
full-pair-cues-effective-under-boundary-conditions |
title |
Full word-pair cues can promote rather than disrupt reactivation when delivered with sufficient spacing and during stable NREM sleep |
description |
Full word-pair cues can promote rather than disrupt reactivation when delivered with sufficient spacing and during stable NREM sleep |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — shin-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.