Claims

A network-supported function-based generative activity intervention produced significantly larger 2010 algebra test score gains than traditional instruction in Singapore secondary schools

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Students taught with the function-based networked generative intervention had significantly greater 2010 test score gains than the control group, with effect size partial Eta Square = 0.101. → Laxman 2012

Evidence

Laxman 2012

Kumar Laxman. (2012). Conceptualizing Alternative Ways of Curricular Teaching Through Technology. li-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1101699

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pre-post study in two Singapore government schools; experimental classes (8) taught function-based networked generative activities, control classes (7) traditional algebra. ANOVA on gain scores showed "a significant treatment effect of the intervention on 2010 test score gains" with printed effect size partial Eta Square = 0.101.

"The ANOVA test showed a significant treatment effect of the intervention on 2010 test score gains (F(1, 527) = 59.2, p< 0.001, partial Eta Square = 0.101."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.