Recurring functional/conceptual spaces (personal space, shared work area, conclusions, discard) emerged in every interaction, and pairs resisted re-designating designated spaces¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Every pair separated discussion text from conclusion text, and once spaces were designated participants resisted altering their purpose even when this became impractical. → Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers 2006

Evidence¶

Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers 2006¶

Nathan Dwyer & Daniel D. Suthers. (2006). Consistent practices in artifact-mediated collaboration. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1: 481–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9001-1

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Across all six sessions, "Every pair used some mechanism to separate the text of the discussion from the text of the conclusions"; e.g., the S3 pair kept writing over a full discussion area (~30% of the sheet) while leaving the results area (~70%) nearly unused.

"Every pair used some mechanism to separate the text of the discussion from the text of the conclusions"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Organizing principles for a shared workspace emerge from implicit negotiation of conventions among group members — related
• Middle episodes of wiki text generation show a cumulative orientation, later with co-construction, in which students expand and re-elaborate each other's ideas — related
• Specific pedagogic design characteristics supported students' joint interaction in the wiki: initial text propositions, Thinking Together preparation, a collectively created artefact, and asynchrony — related
• The initiation-response organizing principle constrains interaction to a linear structure and breaks down when drawing space runs out — related