Claims

Undecided FTIC students who completed a first-year seminar achieved significantly higher fall-to-spring GPA than undecided students in a control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? FYS participants achieved a fall-to-spring GPA of 2.76 vs. 2.38 for control undecided students, a statistically significant difference. → Tampke 2013

Evidence

Tampke 2013

Tampke, D. R., & Durodoye, R. (2013). Improving Academic Success for Undecided Students: A First-Year Seminar/Learning Community Approach. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 1(2), Article 3. http://washingtoncenter.evergreen.edu/lcrpjournal/vol1/iss2/3

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Two-sample t-test comparing fall-to-spring cumulative GPA of undecided FTIC students completing a first-year seminar (n=69) against a control group of undecided students in neither intervention (n=109). The article reports the FYS group achieved a ".38 higher GPA" with t=2.1893, p<0.0299.

"The FYS group achieved a .38 higher GPA and a higher rate of good standing (16.7%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.