Claims

Statistically significant GPA and good-standing advantages for intervention groups disappeared by fall-to-fall measurement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Fall-to-fall GPA and good-standing differences between intervention and control groups were not statistically significant, though the pattern of results remained stable. → Tampke 2013

Evidence

Tampke 2013

Tampke, D. R., & Durodoye, R. (2013). Improving Academic Success for Undecided Students: A First-Year Seminar/Learning Community Approach. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 1(2), Article 3. http://washingtoncenter.evergreen.edu/lcrpjournal/vol1/iss2/3

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Two-sample t-tests of fall-to-fall GPA and good academic standing for FYS (n=69), FYS/LC (n=165), and control (n=109) undecided FTIC students. Fall-to-fall GPA: FYS 2.87 vs. 2.61 (t=-1.67, p<0.10); FYS/LC 2.78 vs. 2.61 (t=-1.23, p<0.22). Good standing: FYS 81.0% vs. 75.0% (p<0.39); FYS/LC 77.0% vs. 75.0% (p<0.73).

"After one academic year, the statistically significant differences disappeared. The pattern of results remain ed stable, however, as the FYS showed the highest GPA and good st anding percentage and the FYS/LC showed the highest retention rates."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.