Claims

Human-GAI paradigms are enacted patterns of engagement rather than fixed individual traits

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The paradigms are conceptualised as enacted patterns of engagement that emerge across disciplinary, socio-technical and institutional contexts, not as fixed traits held by individuals. → Strydom 2026

Evidence

Strydom 2026

Strydom, S. (2026). Framing human-AI dynamics: An epistemological perspective on generative AI practices. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2026.9.2.11

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Conceptual, theory-building argument in which the author contends the seven paradigms are "enacted patterns of engagement" rather than stable dispositions. No empirical data are reported; the claim rests on theoretical argument alone.

"Rather than fixed traits held by individuals, the paradigms are conceptualised as enacted patterns of engagement that emerge across different disciplinary, socio-technical and institutional contexts."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gai-paradigms-enacted-patterns-not-fixed-traits
title Human-GAI paradigms are enacted patterns of engagement rather than fixed individual traits
description Human-GAI paradigms are enacted patterns of engagement rather than fixed individual traits
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — strydom-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.