Dispositions such as openness and shared responsibility are shaped by conditions, not fixed individual traits¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Clear roles, relational trust, and shared decision-making structures supported partners and staff in acting with greater openness, adaptability, and shared responsibility. → Latia P. White 2026

Evidence¶

Latia P. White 2026¶

Latia P. White, Ed. D. (2026). Beyond Participation: The Capacities That Shape Engagement in Collaborative Innovation. Digital Promise, Center for Learner Pathway Innovations. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/e933ec0e-f153-4046-842b-61b696b00ba2 doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/315

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative finding from the dispositions analysis: dispositions "should not be understood only as fixed characteristics"; conversely, limited trust, unclear expectations, or tightly controlled processes could constrain those same dispositions.

"Clear roles, meaningful opportunities to contribute, relational trust, and structures for shared decision-making could support partners and staff in acting with greater openness, adaptability, and shared responsibility."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Time constraints, limited capacity, funder expectations, and communication gaps were the most consistent barriers to participation, offset by recurring structures, relational trust, actionable data, and networked channels — related
• Deeper co-leadership emerges when staff support lets partners progressively take on responsibility, but recedes when staff carry the process — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Staff reflections identify partner skills, knowledge, and dispositions that support full participation in Collaborative Innovation — related
• Partners in participatory evaluation demonstrated capacities in data engagement, contextual and pedagogical knowledge, and openness and improvement-oriented dispositions — related
• Relational trust shapes whether SWOT functions as organisational learning or superficial compliance — related
• The study's findings derive from structured reflections of 10 researchers and 11 program designers, not direct partner reports — related
• Knowledge alone did not ensure meaningful participation; it became influential when clearly communicated and built into programming — related
• Evaluator staff capacities centered on creating conditions for participation rather than technical control — related
• Governance structures that exclude faculty and support staff responsible for implementation produce policies that do not stick — related
• The authors assert that Systems Review participation builds SEA teams' capacity for shared purpose, decision-making, and adaptive change management — related
• AI outcomes in higher education are shaped by leadership capacity, infrastructure readiness, and governance structures rather than functioning independently — related
• Calibrated epistemic vigilance, given adequate prior knowledge, is the binding constraint on productive augmentation with AI — related
• Empowering and distributive leadership styles are associated with greater faculty engagement and willingness to adopt AI in higher education, per the reviewed studies — related
• Presenting prototypes to community partners created a sense of accountability among students that extended beyond grading — related
• Student co-authorship and open-source release enacted epistemic equity, transitioning students from data sources to knowledge producers — related
• Role rotation created opportunities for perspective-taking and collaborative accountability, but also produced difficulty adapting to unfamiliar roles and uneven participation — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Digital education innovations are an interplay of technological, pedagogical, organisational and governance-related dimensions — related
• Human-GAI paradigms are enacted patterns of engagement rather than fixed individual traits — related
• Sustainable AI adoption depends on the interaction of three interdependent conditions: normative friction, governance-based equity, and epistemic integrity — related
• Digital transformation permeates all levels of the education system as an interdependent structure — related
• Engaging students as partners in analyzing and discussing student experience data creates authentic engagement and signals responsiveness to students — related
• Participation supports were most effective when deliberately matched to the specific constraints participants faced — related
• Systematic role rotation structured pre-service educational psychologists' engagement in AI-supported case-based learning by distributing problem-framing, analytical, intervention-oriented, and reflective responsibilities — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Power should be conceptualized as diffuse and structural, and as people's capacity to act under constraint — related
• Participants enact agency through others by empowering across participant categories: educational staff empower students, while societal partners and students empower each other — related