Choosing to gamble enhances both memory accuracy and memory strength in experiential and observational learning alike¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Recognition accuracy was positively influenced by the decision to gamble, with no difference between learning conditions. → Maria A. Woitow 2026
q3 i? Memory strength was higher for play than pass trials independent of learning condition. → Maria A. Woitow 2026
Evidence¶
Maria A. Woitow 2026¶
Maria A. Woitow, Anthony I. Jang, Ben Eppinger, Matthew R. Nassar, Marcel Brass & Julia M. Rodriguez Buritica. (2026). Shared effects of one's own and others' experiences during reinforcement learning on episodic memory. npj Science of Learning 11:16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00409-7
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Mixed-effects models on recognition data from 79 participants; the play-versus-pass choice effect on accuracy was significant (ß = 0.04, t = 2.26, p = 0.025) and "did not differ between learning conditions" (interaction ß = 0.01, p = 0.62); memory strength was likewise higher for play trials (ß = 0.07, t = 3.10, p = 0.002).
"Participants’ recognition accuracy was positively influenced by the decision to gamble (Fig. 3a; choice: ß = 0.04, t = 2.26, p = 0.025). Notably, this effect did not differ between learning conditions ( learning condition x choice: ß = 0.01, t =0 . 5 0 ,p = 0.62)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Competitive attitudes toward the observed player predict memory strength in experiential but not observational learning — related
- More extreme potential reward values are associated with reduced memory strength across learning conditions and choices — related
- Positive image reward prediction errors during gambling or observed gambling selectively enhance memory in both experiential and observational learning — related
- Recognition accuracy for incidentally encoded images does not significantly differ between experiential and observational learning conditions — related
- Subjective memory strength is higher for images from experiential than observational learning trials — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
gambling-enhances-memory-both-conditions |
title |
Choosing to gamble enhances both memory accuracy and memory strength in experiential and observational learning alike |
description |
Choosing to gamble enhances both memory accuracy and memory strength in experiential and observational learning alike |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — maria-a-woitow-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.