Claims

Rhythmic motor skill academic performance is better after a gamified exergaming intervention than after traditional PE teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Students in the gamified exergaming intervention scored higher on the rhythmic motor skill academic performance test than students in the traditional didactic intervention. → Quintas 2020

Evidence

Quintas 2020

Quintas, A., Bustamante, J.-C., Pradas, F., & Castellar, C. (2020). Psychological effects of gamified didactics with exergames in Physical Education at primary schools: results from a natural experiment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103874

q2 · i1 · causal · r2

Post-treatment comparison of the final group-choreography performance exam, filmed and rated on a 1-5 rhythm scale, between the gamified exergaming and control groups. The article reports a significant group difference with ηp2=.032 (a small effect) and that rhythmic motor skill academic performance was better in the gamified exergaming intervention.

"A significant difference appeared i n rhythmic motor skill academic performance between the groups (t(406)=-7.21, p=.000, ηp2=.032). Rhythmic motor skill academic performance was better in t he gamified exergaming intervention than in the non-gamified and non -exergaming intervention."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gamified-exergaming-better-rhythmic-motor-skill
title Rhythmic motor skill academic performance is better after a gamified exergaming intervention than after traditional PE teaching
description Rhythmic motor skill academic performance is better after a gamified exergaming intervention than after traditional PE teaching
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — quintas-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.