Claims

A game-based assessment of persistence predicts physics post-test gains for low-performing players after controlling for background and enjoyment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The GAP related to post-test scores of low performers even after controlling for gender, video game experience, physics pretest, and enjoyment (pr = 0.26, p < 0.05). → Ventura 2013

Evidence

Ventura 2013

Ventura, M., Shute, V., & Small, M. (2013). Assessing Persistence in Educational Games. Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems - Volume 2: Adaptive Instructional Management. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Assessing+Persistence+in+Educational+Games

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Log-file analysis of 70 8th and 9th grade students who played Newton's Playground for around four hours across five 45-minute sessions. The authors report that "the GAP relates to the post -test scores of low performers" with pr = 0.26, p < 0.05 after controls; no standardized effect size is printed.

"Additionally, the GAP relates to the post -test scores of low performers even after controlling for gender, video game experience, physics pretest, and enjoym ent (pr = 0.26, p < 0.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gap-predicts-learning-gains-struggling-players
title A game-based assessment of persistence predicts physics post-test gains for low-performing players after controlling for background and enjoyment
description A game-based assessment of persistence predicts physics post-test gains for low-performing players after controlling for background and enjoyment
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
recheck_by 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ventura-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.