Control schools faced severe textbook shortages: only two of 22 audited schools had sufficient Grade 6 mathematics textbooks and around half had no copies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the 22 control schools audited, only two had sufficient Grade 6 mathematics textbooks for all learners, and around half had no copies. → Brahm Fleisch 2011
Evidence¶
Brahm Fleisch 2011¶
Brahm Fleisch, Nick Taylor, Roelien Herholdt and Ingrid Sapire. (2011). Evaluation of Back to Basics mathematics workbooks: a randomised control trial of the Primary Mathematics Research Project. South African Journal of Education, Vol 31:488-504. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1136612
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Audit of all learner materials for Grade 6 mathematics in the 22 control schools in May 2009 (Table 2); schools were using 11 different approved titles, and in half the schools learners had no access to a single copy.
"in the 22 control schools audited, only two had sufficient Grade 6 mathematics textbooks for all learners, and around half had no copies"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Grade 6 learners show no significant difference in mathematics gains whether using a customised workbook or a conventional textbook — related
- Under the study's costing assumptions, the PM workbook materials are more expensive per learner per year than the CM textbook and teacher guide — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.