Claims

Control schools faced severe textbook shortages: only two of 22 audited schools had sufficient Grade 6 mathematics textbooks and around half had no copies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the 22 control schools audited, only two had sufficient Grade 6 mathematics textbooks for all learners, and around half had no copies. → Brahm Fleisch 2011

Evidence

Brahm Fleisch 2011

Brahm Fleisch, Nick Taylor, Roelien Herholdt and Ingrid Sapire. (2011). Evaluation of Back to Basics mathematics workbooks: a randomised control trial of the Primary Mathematics Research Project. South African Journal of Education, Vol 31:488-504. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1136612

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Audit of all learner materials for Grade 6 mathematics in the 22 control schools in May 2009 (Table 2); schools were using 11 different approved titles, and in half the schools learners had no access to a single copy.

"in the 22 control schools audited, only two had sufficient Grade 6 mathematics textbooks for all learners, and around half had no copies"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.