Claims

Under the study's costing assumptions, the PM workbook materials are more expensive per learner per year than the CM textbook and teacher guide

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Total annual unit costs were R58.96 for PM versus R46.90 for CM, making the workbook more expensive under the stated assumptions. → Brahm Fleisch 2011

Evidence

Brahm Fleisch 2011

Brahm Fleisch, Nick Taylor, Roelien Herholdt and Ingrid Sapire. (2011). Evaluation of Back to Basics mathematics workbooks: a randomised control trial of the Primary Mathematics Research Project. South African Journal of Education, Vol 31:488-504. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1136612

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Cost comparison of publisher prices paid in January 2010 (Table 8), assuming CM multi-year use with replacement every two years and PM use over three years covering half the year's work, doubled for a full year.

"Within the constraints of our assumptions, which we consider to be realistic, the PM materials are more expensive than the CM textbook and accompanying teacher guide."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.