Claims

Experimental group's reading scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest under genre-based instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's mean reading score rose from 52.12 at pretest to 67.50 at posttest, a statistically significant paired difference (p = .000). → Rezvan Adelnia 2016

Evidence

Rezvan Adelnia 2016

Rezvan Adelnia, Hadi Salehi. (2016). Improving Iranian High School Students' Reading Comprehension Using the Tenets of Genre Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.187

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-samples t-test on the 40 experimental participants' pre and posttest scores (Table 4: t = -5.536, df = 39, Sig. = .000). The article states this rejects the first null hypothesis and that "the difference between the performance of the experimental group in pretest and posttest is statistically significant".

"As it is seen in Table 3, the mean difference of the participants in experimental group in pre and posttest is 15.38, with the mean score of pretest being 52.12 and that of posttest being 67.50."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.