Claims

Genre-based reading instruction produces significantly higher reading posttest scores than traditional instruction for Iranian female high school EFL learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After 10 sessions, the genre-based experimental group scored significantly higher than the traditionally taught control group on the reading posttest (mean difference 7.08, p = .027). → Rezvan Adelnia 2016

Evidence

Rezvan Adelnia 2016

Rezvan Adelnia, Hadi Salehi. (2016). Improving Iranian High School Students' Reading Comprehension Using the Tenets of Genre Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.4p.187

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental comparison of 40 experimental and 40 control participants after 10 sessions of instruction on the same 10 descriptive passages. The independent-samples t-test in Table 6 reports t = 2.248, df = 78, Sig. = .027, mean difference 7.07500. The article reports "a significant difference between the performance of the control and experimental groups in reading posttest".

"According to Table 5, in the posttest, the mean score of the participants in the experimental group is 67.50 and in the control group is 60.42, showing a mean difference of 7.08 which seems to be significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.