Claims

Reported no gender difference in the effect of emotional intelligence training on academic self-efficacy, despite a printed significant t-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The article reports no significant gender difference in academic self-efficacy (t=3.41, p=.003), although the printed p-value is below the stated 0.05 significance level. → Yunusa Umaru & Abdulwahid Umma 2015

Evidence

Yunusa Umaru & Abdulwahid Umma 2015

Yunusa Umaru & Abdulwahid Umma. (2015). Effect of Instruction in Emotional Intelligence Skills on Locus of Control and Academic Self-Efficacy among Junior Secondary School Students in Niger State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079778

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Gender comparison on the Academic Self Efficacy Scale: t=3.41, p=.003, yet the article concludes there is no significant difference and retains the null hypothesis. The table lists N of 20 per gender, while Table 4 lists 10 per gender.

"Details from Table 8 above, showed that (t= 3.41, P = .003). This means that there is no significant di fference between male and female secondary school students w ho were exposed to emotional intelligence skills."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.