Claims

The technological gender gap emerges only within Technology-oriented pathways, with parity in Arts and Sciences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within-pathway tests found no significant gender difference in active creation confidence in Arts and Humanities (n=48, p=0.841) or Sciences (n=75, p=0.142), but a significant gap in the Technology pathway (n=111, p=0.046). → Nicolas Rodriguez-Alvarez 2026

Evidence

Nicolas Rodriguez-Alvarez 2026

Nicolas Rodriguez-Alvarez, Alan Martin Blanch-Marsolini, Samuel Vara-Gutierrez, Hugo Gil-Garcia, Javier Calzon-Dueñas, and Fernando Rodriguez-Merino. (2026). The Illusion of Competence: Self-Perceived Digital Literacy and AI Readiness Among European Secondary Students. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26010 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26010

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Intra-pathway analysis using independent t-tests with Welch's correction compared male-female self-efficacy within each elective field; only the Technology pathway (n=111) showed a significant gap, the authors call "statistically significant".

"However, within the Technology-oriented pathway (𝑛= 111), a statistically significant gender gap emerged (𝑝= 0.046), as illustrated in Figure 3, with male students reporting disproportionately higher self-efficacy than their female classmates."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gender-gap-emerges-only-in-technology-pathway
title The technological gender gap emerges only within Technology-oriented pathways, with parity in Arts and Sciences
description The technological gender gap emerges only within Technology-oriented pathways, with parity in Arts and Sciences
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nicolas-rodriguez-alvarez-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.