Male and female students show different tendencies in which media scaffolding they use¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Observation showed 70% of male students used props and 60% of female students used charts, with visual least used by both (10% each). → Sutiarso 2018
Evidence¶
Sutiarso 2018¶
Sutiarso, S., Coesamin, M., & Nurhanurawati. (2018). The effect of various media scaffolding on increasing understanding of students' geometry concepts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 95-102. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive percentage analysis of observations of 10 male and 10 female students choosing among charts, props, and visual media. Table 2 reports male students: props 70%, charts 20%, visual 10%; female students: charts 60%, props 30%, visual 10%.
"Based on Table 2, it seems that the charts and props as media scaffolding that is widely used student than visual, with details of many male students using charts and many female students using props."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Model-observer gender combination affects mental effort invested during example study: male students invest less effort with a male model, female students more effort with a male model — related
- Media scaffolding increases fifth-grade students' understanding of geometry concepts more effectively than no media scaffolding — related
- Students preferred charts and props over visual media because they found them more practical and more helpful for understanding — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.