Students preferred charts and props over visual media because they found them more practical and more helpful for understanding¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Interviews showed students chose charts and props because they helped understanding and were more practical than visual media. → Sutiarso 2018
Evidence¶
Sutiarso 2018¶
Sutiarso, S., Coesamin, M., & Nurhanurawati. (2018). The effect of various media scaffolding on increasing understanding of students' geometry concepts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 95-102. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive analysis of student interviews in the experimental class. Students explained choices such as "Because the chart easier to use" and that props could be "more easily removed and installed again", while visual was confusing to use.
"Results of interviews with students found other reasons why students prefer a chart rather than visual, that is because charts and props more help in understanding the concepts of geometry and more practical than the visual."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Male and female students show different tendencies in which media scaffolding they use — related
- Students strongly prefer qualitative tree visualizations over quantitative radar charts of classroom collaboration — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.