Claims

Students reported positive perceptions of GeoGebra for learning circles, with lower confidence in using the software

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Most experimental students gave positive feedback on GeoGebra, but only 54% felt confident using the software during the activities. → Shadaan 2013

Evidence

Shadaan 2013

Shadaan, P., & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students' Understanding in Learning Circles. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086434

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of a survey questionnaire administered to the experimental group after treatment; 93% reported learning a lot, 82% were excited and engaged, while the article notes "some students reported they were not so confident when using the GeoGebra software" (54% agreed they felt confident).

"The majority of students, about 93% of them mentioned that they learnt a lot using GeoGebra and benefited much through the teacher-students interactions when using GeoGebra, while 82% of the students mentioned that they were excited about using GeoGebra software"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.