Claims

Speaking-skill score distribution shifted upward after integrative teaching (mean 65.75 to 76.5)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The group mean rose from 65.75 (S = 11.6) on the pre-test to 76.5 (S = 8.28) on the post-test, with the lowest score moving from 50 to 60. → Litualy 2016

Evidence

Litualy 2016

Litualy, S. J. (2016). Integrative Teaching Techniques and Improvement of German Speaking Learning Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095832

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive results from the post-test of the same 20-respondent single-group study. The article reports post-test "X = 76.5 and S = 8.28" against pre-test X = 65.75 and S = 11.6 (Table 1 and Table 2); these are descriptive statistics with no effect size printed.

"The above data shows that the highest learning results obtained by the group of students is 90 by 2 respondents, while the lowest learning outcomes achieved by stud ents is 60 by 2 people from learning results the ma ximum is 100 with X = 76.5 and S = 8.28."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.