Speaking-skill score distribution shifted upward after integrative teaching (mean 65.75 to 76.5)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The group mean rose from 65.75 (S = 11.6) on the pre-test to 76.5 (S = 8.28) on the post-test, with the lowest score moving from 50 to 60. → Litualy 2016
Evidence¶
Litualy 2016¶
Litualy, S. J. (2016). Integrative Teaching Techniques and Improvement of German Speaking Learning Skills. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1095832
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive results from the post-test of the same 20-respondent single-group study. The article reports post-test "X = 76.5 and S = 8.28" against pre-test X = 65.75 and S = 11.6 (Table 1 and Table 2); these are descriptive statistics with no effect size printed.
"The above data shows that the highest learning results obtained by the group of students is 90 by 2 respondents, while the lowest learning outcomes achieved by stud ents is 60 by 2 people from learning results the ma ximum is 100 with X = 76.5 and S = 8.28."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Figure 1 shows an upward intercept shift in post-implementation proficiency for City Connects students relative to comparison students — related
- Experimental (ABSI) group's achievement scores increased significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's did not — related
- Vocabulary performance shifted from B1–B2 CEFR levels at pre-test to B2–C1 at post-test after four weeks of Mangomon play — related
- Low-scoring experimental-group students moved from 25% scoring below 25% at pre-test to none scoring below 25% at post-test, with scores reaching as much as 56.8% — related
- Both groups improved their speaking scores from pre-test to post-test, but the Small Group Activity group's mean gain (25.35) was larger than the Individual Activity group's (11.64) — related
- Integrative teaching techniques improve German speaking-skill learning outcomes in a single-group quasi-experiment — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.