Claims

In one study summarised in a policy brief, students and teachers who learned their commonalities through getting-to-know-you surveys reported more positive relationships, students earned higher grades, and achievement gaps for Black and Latinx students closed by more than 60%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A policy brief reports, without identifying or describing the study, that in one study students and teachers who learned about their commonalities reported more positive relationships, students earned higher grades, and achievement gap disparities for Black and Latinx students closed by more than 60%. → Hernández 2024

Evidence

Hernández 2024

Hernández, L. E., & Darling-Hammond, L. (with Nielson, N.). (2024). Cultivating relationships in secondary classrooms: Practices that matter. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/cultivating-relationships-secondary-classrooms-brief

q2 · i? · review · r1

A research brief, not the study itself: it describes getting-to-know-you surveys administered at the beginning of the year (families, interests, hobbies, goals, educational strengths) and reports the results of "one study" secondhand, without naming it or describing its design. The gap-closure figure of more than 60% is printed in the brief, but no standardized effect size is, so impact is coded i? (not reported), which does not mean the effect was null. The brief's wording reports more positive relationships and higher grades; it does not establish that the surveys caused them.

"In one study, students and teachers who learned about their commonalities reported more positive relationships with each other. Students in that study also earned higher grades when teachers learned what they had in common, and achievement gap disparities for Black and Latinx students closed by more than 60%."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id getting-to-know-you-surveys-commonalities-gap-closure
title In one study summarised in a policy brief, students and teachers who learned their commonalities through getting-to-know-you surveys reported more positive relationships, students earned higher grades, and achievement gaps for Black and Latinx students closed by more than 60%
description In one study summarised in a policy brief, students and teachers who learned their commonalities through getting-to-know-you surveys reported more positive relationships, students earned higher grades, and achievement gaps for Black and Latinx students closed by more than 60%
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hernández-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.