Fluid intelligence strongly predicts the creative quality of produced metaphors (β = .45)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Fluid intelligence strongly predicted creative metaphor quality in a structural equation model (β = .45, p = .017). → Roger E. Beaty & Paul J. Silvia 2013
Evidence¶
Roger E. Beaty & Paul J. Silvia 2013¶
Roger E. Beaty & Paul J. Silvia. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0258-5
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Structural equation modeling of data from 191 undergraduates who completed three Gf tasks and two creative metaphor prompts rated by four raters. The model found fluid intelligence strongly predicted creative metaphors, with "β 0 .45, p 0 .017", described by the authors as large by Cohen's benchmarks.
"As was e xpected, fluid intelligence strongly predicted creative metaphors ( β 0 .45, p 0 .017). This effect size can be interpreted as “large” using the benchmarks of .10 for small, .30 for medium, and .50 for large (Cohen, 1988)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- General Cognitive Ability — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Creative and conventional metaphors are anchored in different patterns of cognitive abilities — a broader claim this one bears on
- Openness to experience predicts creative metaphor quality, and controlling for personality reduces Gc's creative-metaphor effect to zero — related
- Crystallized intelligence predicts conventional metaphor quality, while Gf and Gr effects are small and nonsignificant — related
- Updating ability, together with openness, explains a substantial part of the shared variance between fluid intelligence and creativity. — related
- Openness to experience predicts creativity but not fluid intelligence, and further reduces the residual intelligence–creativity correlation to a trend. — related
- Broad retrieval ability has a large effect on creative metaphor quality (β = .52) — related
- Executive functions substantially account for the latent intelligence–creativity correlation, leaving a reduced but still positive residual of r = .34. — related
- Intelligence and creativity share more variance than the traditional assumption of distinct abilities holds — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
gf-predicts-creative-metaphor-quality |
title |
Fluid intelligence strongly predicts the creative quality of produced metaphors (β = .45) |
description |
Fluid intelligence strongly predicts the creative quality of produced metaphors (β = .45) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — roger-e-beaty-paul-j-silvia-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.