Claims

Broad retrieval ability has a large effect on creative metaphor quality (β = .52)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Broad retrieval ability (Gr) had a large effect on creative metaphor quality (β = .52, p < .001). → Roger E. Beaty & Paul J. Silvia 2013

Evidence

Roger E. Beaty & Paul J. Silvia 2013

Roger E. Beaty & Paul J. Silvia. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0258-5

q3 · i? · associational · r2

In the same SEM of 191 undergraduates, three verbal fluency tasks indexed Gr. The model found Gr "had a similarly large effect on metaphor creativity ( β 0 .52, p < .001)", while Gc's effect was moderate but nonsignificant.

"Gr had a similarly large effect on metaphor creativity ( β 0 .52, p < .001), and Gc had a moderate but nonsignificant effect ( β 0 .24, p 0 .206)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gr-large-effect-creative-metaphor
title Broad retrieval ability has a large effect on creative metaphor quality (β = .52)
description Broad retrieval ability has a large effect on creative metaphor quality (β = .52)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — roger-e-beaty-paul-j-silvia-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.