Claims

Girls were on average more accurate than boys in equation rearrangement, with no significant difference in speed

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associational r1–r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Girls were more accurate than boys (Gender main effect on accuracy, effect size η2 p = 0.019). → Susac A 2014 q3 i? The Gender main effect on reaction times was not statistically significant. → Susac A 2014 (2)

Evidence

Susac A 2014

Susac A, Bubic A, Vrbanc A and Planinic M (2014) Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00679

q3 · i1 · associational · r1

Two-way ANOVA (Age × Gender) on accuracy in the computerized equation test; printed effect size η2 p = 0.019 for the Gender main effect. "On average, girls were more accurate than boys."

"a statistically significant main effect of Age [F(3,323) = 9.43, p < 0.001, η2 p = 0.081] and Gender [ F(1,323) = 6.40, p < 0.05, η2 p = 0.019]"

Susac A 2014 (2)

Susac A, Bubic A, Vrbanc A and Planinic M (2014) Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00679

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Same ANOVA design on reaction times: the Gender main effect was not statistically significant (F(1,322) = 0.09); no meaningful effect size printed, so no speed difference was detected.

"The main effect of Gender was not statistically significant for RT s [F(1,322) = 0.09, p > 0.05, η2 p < 0.0001]"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id girls-more-accurate-equal-speed-equation-solving
title Girls were on average more accurate than boys in equation rearrangement, with no significant difference in speed
description Girls were on average more accurate than boys in equation rearrangement, with no significant difference in speed
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2014
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — susac-a-2014, susac-a-2014-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.