Girls were on average more accurate than boys in equation rearrangement, with no significant difference in speed¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 associationalr1–r2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Girls were more accurate than boys (Gender main effect on accuracy, effect size η2 p = 0.019). → Susac A 2014
q3 i? The Gender main effect on reaction times was not statistically significant. → Susac A 2014 (2)
Evidence¶
Susac A 2014¶
Susac A, Bubic A, Vrbanc A and Planinic M (2014) Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00679
q3 · i1 · associational · r1
Two-way ANOVA (Age × Gender) on accuracy in the computerized equation test; printed effect size η2 p = 0.019 for the Gender main effect. "On average, girls were more accurate than boys."
"a statistically significant main effect of Age [F(3,323) = 9.43, p < 0.001, η2 p = 0.081] and Gender [ F(1,323) = 6.40, p < 0.05, η2 p = 0.019]"
Susac A 2014 (2)¶
Susac A, Bubic A, Vrbanc A and Planinic M (2014) Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00679
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Same ANOVA design on reaction times: the Gender main effect was not statistically significant (F(1,322) = 0.09); no meaningful effect size printed, so no speed difference was detected.
"The main effect of Gender was not statistically significant for RT s [F(1,322) = 0.09, p > 0.05, η2 p < 0.0001]"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Equations of the form a/x = b are the most difficult equation type, reflecting procedural complexity — related
- Boys responded faster than girls on the test, but the response-time difference did not affect achievement — related
- No significant gender differences in CTAT performance within either educational pathway — related
- Boys received more process praise and scored higher in 4th grade math than girls in this sample — related
- SAT scores underpredict the academic performance of high school girls, who average lower scores than boys despite higher grades — related
- In this group the average girl's grades equal or exceed the average boy's in all six subjects, with the largest advantage in Latin — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
girls-more-accurate-equal-speed-equation-solving |
title |
Girls were on average more accurate than boys in equation rearrangement, with no significant difference in speed |
description |
Girls were on average more accurate than boys in equation rearrangement, with no significant difference in speed |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2014 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — susac-a-2014, susac-a-2014-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.