Claims

Giving suggestions to peers is a significant predictor of assessors' own project performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The number of suggestions given to peers significantly predicted assessors' final project scores (t = 2.17, p < .05). → Jingyan Lu 2012

Evidence

Jingyan Lu 2012

Jingyan Lu, Nancy Law. (2012). Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science 40:257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2

q2 · i? · associational · r2

In the same hierarchical multiple regression (N = 181), giving suggestions to peers was a significant predictor of final project scores (t = 2.17, p< .05). Suggestions were the second most frequently given type of cognitive feedback in the descriptive statistics.

"Giving suggestions to peers (t = 2.17, p< .05), giving feedback on identifying problems to peers (t = 2.16, p< .05), and positive affective feedback from peers ( t = 2.25, p< .05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id giving-suggestions-predicts-assessor-performance
title Giving suggestions to peers is a significant predictor of assessors' own project performance
description Giving suggestions to peers is a significant predictor of assessors' own project performance
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2012
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jingyan-lu-2012

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.