Claims

Higher course grades predict larger ACT gains regardless of starting PLAN score; students with Ds or Fs lose ground

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among students with an eleventh-grade Reading PLAN score of 17, ACT scores rose monotonically with English grades (As averaged 18.5, Bs 18.0, Cs 17.2), while students with Ds or Fs scored below their earlier PLAN scores. → John Q. Easton 2008

Evidence

John Q. Easton 2008

John Q. Easton, Stephen Ponisciak, Stuart Luppescu. (2008). From High School to the Future: The Pathway to 20. Research Report, Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/high-school-future-pathway-20

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Analysis from the CCSR ACT preparation study of test score growth from fall eleventh-grade PLAN to spring ACT across four subject areas, controlling for other factors. Figure 7 shows the same grade-achievement relationship for Math ACT, and the report states it holds for all four subjects regardless of starting PLAN score.

"Students who got As in eleventh grade English averaged 18.5 on the ACT; students who got Bs averaged 18.0; C grades resulted in ACT scores of 17.2; and students with Ds or Fs in English actually received ACT scores lower than their earlier PLAN scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id good-grades-predict-act-gains
title Higher course grades predict larger ACT gains regardless of starting PLAN score; students with Ds or Fs lose ground
description Higher course grades predict larger ACT gains regardless of starting PLAN score; students with Ds or Fs lose ground
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2008
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — john-q-easton-2008

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.