Claims

GPT-4 achieves the highest pooled accuracy among LLMs (81%), significantly outperforming GPT-3.5 (60%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? By model type, pooled accuracy was highest for GPT-4 (81%), followed by Bing (79%), Claude (74%), Gemini/Bard (70%), and GPT-3.5 (60%), with statistically significant differences among models (P=0.001). → Nouri Haniyeh 2025

Evidence

Nouri Haniyeh 2025

Nouri Haniyeh, Mahdavi Abdollah, Abedi Ali, Mohammadnia Alireza, Hamedan Mahnaz, Amanzadeh Masoud. (2025). Performance of large language models in medical licensing examinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.36

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analysis by LLM type across the 36 included studies (GPT-4 n=30, GPT-3.5 n=23, Bing n=4, Claude n=3, Gemini/Bard n=3). The review reports GPT-4 "pooled accuracy was highest" at 81% versus 60% for GPT-3.5, P=0.001.

"By model type, pooled accuracy was highest for GPT-4 (81%), followed by Bing (79%), Claude (74%), Gemini/Bard (70%), and GPT-3.5 (60%), with statistically significant differences among models (P=0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.