Claims

Large language models achieve a pooled accuracy of 72% on medical licensing examination questions across 36 studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across 36 included studies evaluating 63 LLMs, pooled accuracy on medical licensing examination questions was 72% (95% CI, 70.0%–75.0%). → Nouri Haniyeh 2025

Evidence

Nouri Haniyeh 2025

Nouri Haniyeh, Mahdavi Abdollah, Abedi Ali, Mohammadnia Alireza, Hamedan Mahnaz, Amanzadeh Masoud. (2025). Performance of large language models in medical licensing examinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.36

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Random-effects meta-analysis of 36 studies (2,404 records screened) evaluating LLM accuracy on medical licensing examination questions. The review reports "The pooled accuracy of all models was 72%" with very high heterogeneity (I2=99.99%).

"The pooled accuracy of all models was 72% (95% CI, 70.0%–75.0%). The heterogeneity across studies was significant (I2=99.99%, P<0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.