Grant aid increases degree completion, raising on-time completion by 2.4 and delayed completion by 2.5 percentage points in U.S. causal studies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr3·q4
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i? Grant aid increases on-time degree completion by 2.4 percentage points. → Nguyen 2018
q4 i? Grant aid increases delayed degree completion by 2.5 percentage points. → Nguyen 2018 (2)
Evidence¶
Nguyen 2018¶
Nguyen, T.D., Kramer, J.W., & Evans, B.J. (2018). The Effects of Grant Aid on Student Persistence and Degree Attainment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence (CEPA Working Paper No. 18-04). Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis. http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp18-04
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Random-effects meta-analysis of 20 U.S. on-time degree completion estimates from causal studies; the pooled estimate is that grant aid "increases on-time and delayed completion by 2.4 percentage points and 2.5 percentage points respectively." No standardized effect size is printed.
"In terms of degree completion, we find that grant aid increases on-time and delayed completion by 2.4 percentage points and 2.5 percentage points respectively with reasonably precise standard errors."
Nguyen 2018 (2)¶
Nguyen, T.D., Kramer, J.W., & Evans, B.J. (2018). The Effects of Grant Aid on Student Persistence and Degree Attainment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence (CEPA Working Paper No. 18-04). Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis. http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp18-04
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Same random-effects meta-analysis, delayed completion subgroup of 19 U.S. estimates; the pooled delayed-completion effect is 2.5 percentage points with reasonably precise standard errors, as printed in the same results sentence. No standardized effect size is printed.
"In terms of degree completion, we find that grant aid increases on-time and delayed completion by 2.4 percentage points and 2.5 percentage points respectively with reasonably precise standard errors."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Grant aid programs bundling additional academic or social supports show larger persistence and completion effects than aid alone — related
- Effects of grant aid on persistence and completion are heterogeneous across studies, justifying random-effects meta-analysis — related
- An additional $1,000 of grant aid improves year-to-year persistence by a statistically significant 1.2 percentage points, with smaller statistically insignificant effects on degree completion — related
- Grant aid increases postsecondary persistence, raising within-year persistence by 3.2 and year-to-year persistence by 1.8 percentage points in U.S. causal studies — related
- Need-based grant aid improves persistence and completion while merit-only aid shows no detectable effect on these outcomes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
grant-aid-increases-degree-completion |
title |
Grant aid increases degree completion, raising on-time completion by 2.4 and delayed completion by 2.5 percentage points in U.S. causal studies |
description |
Grant aid increases degree completion, raising on-time completion by 2.4 and delayed completion by 2.5 percentage points in U.S. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
strong |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — nguyen-2018, nguyen-2018-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.