Claims

Grant aid increases postsecondary persistence, raising within-year persistence by 3.2 and year-to-year persistence by 1.8 percentage points in U.S. causal studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r3 · q4
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? Grant aid increases within-year persistence by 3.2 percentage points (statistically significant at the 5% level). → Nguyen 2018 q4 i? Grant aid increases year-to-year persistence by 1.8 percentage points, highly statistically significant. → Nguyen 2018 (2)

Evidence

Nguyen 2018

Nguyen, T.D., Kramer, J.W., & Evans, B.J. (2018). The Effects of Grant Aid on Student Persistence and Degree Attainment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence (CEPA Working Paper No. 18-04). Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis. http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp18-04

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Random-effects meta-analysis of nine U.S. studies providing within-year persistence estimates; the pooled estimate indicates grant aid "increases within year persistence by 3.2 percentage points," significant at the 5% level despite a sizable standard error. No standardized effect size is printed.

"In terms of within year persistence, the summary estimate from nine studies indicates that grant aid increases within year persistence by 3.2 percentage points."

Nguyen 2018 (2)

Nguyen, T.D., Kramer, J.W., & Evans, B.J. (2018). The Effects of Grant Aid on Student Persistence and Degree Attainment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence (CEPA Working Paper No. 18-04). Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis. http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp18-04

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Random-effects meta-analysis of 25 U.S. year-to-year persistence estimates from causal studies; the pooled effect is "a modest 1.8 percentage points" with standard error .005 and a 95% CI of about one to three percentage points. No standardized effect size is printed.

"Next we find grant aid increases year-to-year persistence by a modest 1.8 percentage points with a fairly precise standard error of .005, which is highly statistically significant; the 95% confidence interval ranges from about one to three percentage points."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id grant-aid-increases-postsecondary-persistence
title Grant aid increases postsecondary persistence, raising within-year persistence by 3.2 and year-to-year persistence by 1.8 percentage points in U.S. causal studies
description Grant aid increases postsecondary persistence, raising within-year persistence by 3.2 and year-to-year persistence by 1.8 percentage points in U.S.
status review
evidence_strength strong
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — nguyen-2018, nguyen-2018-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.