Claims

Frequent eye transitions between graph and problem statement were marginally associated with correct answers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Transitions between the graph and the problem statement were marginally higher for students who answered correctly; no other transition types differed. → Ögren 2017

Evidence

Ögren 2017

Ögren, M., Nyström, M., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). There's more to the multimedia effect than meets the eye: is seeing pictures believing? Instructional Science, 45, 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9397-6

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Multi-level logistic regression (Table 7) on transition counts between AOIs; the effect was marginally significant (z = 1.734, p = 0.0829). No significant differences were found for input–graph or input–statement transitions.

"there is a marginally significant effect (p ¼ 0:08) that the number of transitions between the graph and the problem statement were higher for students that answered a problem correctly"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id graph-statement-transitions-performance
title Frequent eye transitions between graph and problem statement were marginally associated with correct answers
description Frequent eye transitions between graph and problem statement were marginally associated with correct answers
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ögren-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.