Frequent eye transitions between graph and problem statement were marginally associated with correct answers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Transitions between the graph and the problem statement were marginally higher for students who answered correctly; no other transition types differed. → Ögren 2017
Evidence¶
Ögren 2017¶
Ögren, M., Nyström, M., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). There's more to the multimedia effect than meets the eye: is seeing pictures believing? Instructional Science, 45, 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9397-6
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Multi-level logistic regression (Table 7) on transition counts between AOIs; the effect was marginally significant (z = 1.734, p = 0.0829). No significant differences were found for input–graph or input–statement transitions.
"there is a marginally significant effect (p ¼ 0:08) that the number of transitions between the graph and the problem statement were higher for students that answered a problem correctly"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Eye fixation data corroborated verbal protocols on the primary representation used (disagreement on only one trial) and revealed additional representations consulted but never mentioned verbally
- No overall multimedia effect on problem-solving performance in vector calculus: graphs did not significantly improve correctness — related
- Performance was unrelated to dwell time on the graph but increased with dwell time on the problem statement — related
- Graphs drew visual attention away from text: proportion of dwell time on input and problem statement was significantly shorter when a graph was present — related
- Contrasting problems show a graph can help on one problem and harm on another: verbal data reveal both more active graph use and more shallow, confident confirmation when graphs were present — related
- Eye transition data showed students made saccades between representations, indicating attempts to relate and integrate information rather than relying only on the model — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
graph-statement-transitions-performance |
title |
Frequent eye transitions between graph and problem statement were marginally associated with correct answers |
description |
Frequent eye transitions between graph and problem statement were marginally associated with correct answers |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ögren-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.