Claims

Grid Model curriculum shows no significant post-test effect on external goal orientation, learning control belief, or test anxiety

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test external goal orientation, learning control, and exam anxiety scores did not differ significantly between experimental and control groups. → Neşe Kutlu Abu 2018

Evidence

Neşe Kutlu Abu 2018

Neşe Kutlu Abu, Murat Gökdere. (2018). The Effect of Differentiated Science Curriculum on Students' Motivational Regulations. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(3): 455-465. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060312

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANOVA results for these three MSLQ sub-dimensions (Table 6: external goal orientation F = 2,240, p = ,091; learning control F = 2,336, p = ,081; exam anxiety F = 1,044, p = ,378). Equivalence was not tested; only non-significance is reported.

"mean scores of students' learning control, external goal orientation and exam anxiety post-test scores do not differ significantly according to experimental and control groups."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.