Claims

Experimental and control groups were equivalent at pre-test on all motivation dimensions except test anxiety

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-test ANOVA found no significant group differences on internal/external goal orientation, task value, learning control belief, or self-efficacy, but a significant difference on test anxiety. → Neşe Kutlu Abu 2018

Evidence

Neşe Kutlu Abu 2018

Neşe Kutlu Abu, Murat Gökdere. (2018). The Effect of Differentiated Science Curriculum on Students' Motivational Regulations. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(3): 455-465. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060312

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANOVA of pre-test MSLQ scores (Table 5; test anxiety F = 3,466, p = ,021). Posthoc testing located the test-anxiety difference between control groups I and II and between experimental group II and control group I, not between experimental and control comparisons.

"there is a meaningful difference in the test anxiety dimension while there is no significant difference between experimental and control groups' internal and external target orientation, task value, learning control belief, pre-test a verages regarding self -efficacy dimensions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.