Group awareness tools showing peer presence, peer activities, or multiple artifacts are integrated in many educational VRLs, but performance and teacher-presence indicators are never standalone¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Peer presence is visible in 10 reviewed labs, peer activities in 9, and 20 labs use multiple group-awareness artifacts. → Kurtz 2025
q2 i? Teacher presence, group performance, and individual performance indicators are never implemented as standalone group awareness tools in the reviewed VRLs. → Kurtz 2025
Evidence¶
Kurtz 2025¶
Kurtz, M., Benabbou, A., Pons, C., & Broisin, J. (2025). Collaboration in virtual and remote laboratories for education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09454-7
q2 · i? · review · r3
Descriptive coding of group awareness functionality across the 62 reviewed publications, as reported in the review's Collaboration results section. It found "peer presence is visible in 10 laboratories" and multiple artifacts in 20 labs; examples include scoreboards and presence avatars.
"Specifically, peer presence is visible in 10 laboratories, peer activi- ties are visible in 9 laboratories, and 20 laboratories integrate multiple artifacts for group"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Guidance tools supporting collaboration are relatively uncommon in educational VRLs, integrated in only 13 of 62 reviewed systems
- Regulation tools for collaboration are very rare in educational VRLs, identified in only 8 laboratories, mostly supporting regulation by teachers
- Synchronous communication is the most common collaboration support integrated in educational VRLs, and few labs offer none
- Only a minority of VRL studies assess collaboration quality or learning, but most studies that measure learning report positive impact
- A systematic review found literature reviews on collaborative learning in VR use very broad VR definitions, with few included papers using HMDs — related
- Collaborative VRLs are predominantly STEM-focused, virtual, non co-located, synchronous, and 2D — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
group-awareness-tools-multimodal-vrls |
title |
Group awareness tools showing peer presence, peer activities, or multiple artifacts are integrated in many educational VRLs, but performance and teacher-presence indicators are never standalone |
description |
Group awareness tools showing peer presence, peer activities, or multiple artifacts are integrated in many educational VRLs, but performance and teacher-presence indicators are never standalone |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kurtz-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.