Claims

Group-delivered interventions appear more effective than individually delivered ones (g = 0.78 vs 0.45)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q4 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i2 Interventions delivered in group (g = 0.78) seemed to be more effective than interventions delivered individually (g = 0.45). → Yijun Ruan 2024

Evidence

Yijun Ruan 2024

Yijun Ruan, Urs Maurer, Catherine McBride. (2024). Effectiveness of Reading Interventions on Literacy Skills for Chinese Children with and Without Dyslexia: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09915-9

q4 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-regression on intervention form as moderator across the 28 RCTs. The article reports group delivery showed a larger effect than individual delivery, hedged with "seemed to".

"Interventions delivered in group (g = 0.78) seemed to be more effective than interventions delivered individually (g = 0.45)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id group-delivery-more-effective-than-individual
title Group-delivered interventions appear more effective than individually delivered ones (g = 0.78 vs 0.45)
description Group-delivered interventions appear more effective than individually delivered ones (g = 0.78 vs 0.45)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yijun-ruan-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.