Group discussion was more effective than lecture-discussion in improving teacher trainees' student learning outcomes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Teacher trainees taught with the group discussion method achieved significantly higher learning outcomes than those taught with the lecture-discussion method (partial eta squared = .406). → Mutrofin 2017

Evidence¶

Mutrofin 2017¶

Mutrofin, Degeng, I.N.S., Ardhana, I.W., & Setyosari, P. (2017). The Effect of Instructional Methods (Lecture-Discussion versus Group Discussion) and Teaching Talent on Teacher Trainees Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138824

q3 · i2 · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental factorialized (2 x 2) nonequivalent control group study of 168 teacher trainees; two-way ANOVA showed the methods main effect was significant, F = 111.864, p < .05, partial eta squared = .406, described as "relatively strong effect size of .406".

"the learning outcomes of students taught by the lecture-discussion method were different from those of students taught by the group discussion method with F test of 111.864, significant at p<.05 and the relatively strong effect size of .406. The group discussion method was proven to be more effective in improving the student learning outcomes than the lecture-discussion method"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Strong teaching talent was more effective than weak teaching talent in improving teacher trainees' student learning outcomes — related
• The interaction of instructional method and teaching talent significantly affected teacher trainees' student learning outcomes — related
• Undergraduate students taught organic chemistry with an analogy instructional strategy achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught by traditional lecture methods — related